Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post Reply
EZYLYF
King of Broken Fly Rods
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:24 am
Location: Tampa

Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by EZYLYF »

Which do you use and why?
Brands?
User avatar
Deek
Supporter 2011 - 2014
Supporter 2011 - 2014
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2012 7:06 pm
Location: Central Florida

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Deek »

I use both. Hard Mason for the basic leader and fluorocarbon for the tippet
Jackson, Big Rig
Hillbilly
Supporter 2011 - 2014
Supporter 2011 - 2014
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Seminole, Fl

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Hillbilly »

I use Tapered Mono for leaders, with Flouro Tippets.
Fluorocarbon is so much more abrasion resistant, and I have a Ladyfish/Trout habit. If Leader or Tippet gets short I replace as needed. I can make a leader last a long time that way. Of course before I change the Leader there may be two/three sizes of Flouro in it.
Only issue is that Flouro doesn't break down. Mono does after a long time. Most manuf have quit putting dates on Flouro.
I usually try to buy my Tippet material when it's on Sale! Then keep it in the dark, mono leaders the same. Because I have to go to Delaware for work, I buy from an Orvis Factory Outlet Store, just convenient.

That's just what I do, everybody has their own preferences. Not wrong just different.
Tempted and Tried by a Fine pair of Legs
Likewise Enticed by Over Easy Eggs
User avatar
Evan
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: SRQ
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Evan »

Everyone does it differently, but I construct my own leaders since they're both cheaper and more versatile. Usually use Seaguar blue label Fluoro for every piece, since it's by far the strongest and most abrasion-resistant leader I've found. I apply some chapstick to each end before tying them together (always with a Slim Beauty) so the knots slide more smoothly. If I'm fishing Gurglers I'll switch to mono since it floats, but beware of mono leaders degrading over time and breaking at inopportune moments.

Try this formula for an 8wt rod and you won't be disappointed:

7 feet of 40# Seaguar fluoro
Slim beauty knot to 3 feet of 30# Seaguar fluoro
Slim beauty knot to 2 feet of 15 or 20# Seaguar fluoro
Everyone is entitled to my opinion
User avatar
BearsFan
Egotistical Prick
Posts: 4040
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: 32303, its like 90210 but with more beer

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by BearsFan »

Write down the date. I agree with Evan!

Mono for topwater, flouro for most of the rest. I like rio, seaguar, and yozuri in no particular order. Each has an application. I have found many of the cheaper ones suck, you definitely get what you pay for.
Senior Exalted Pro Staff Member of the Paddle-Fishing.com Kayak & Canoe Anglers Club

"You think you have problems now? Follow your instincts, it will get worse" -Hatch
EZYLYF
King of Broken Fly Rods
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:24 am
Location: Tampa

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by EZYLYF »

Thanks guys, great information here. I have been using Seaguar Flouro with good luck and did some testing on mono to see how it worked. Overall I like the flouro better, but do feel mono has its place. Was using mono during the Salty Fly TX and lost a fish (one that would have looked excellent on our board ) at my feet just before landing, but after downsizing to 10# that day and the trout had some nice fangs I need to give mono its due respect.

As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?
Todd
PFTS Chairman
PFTS Chairman
Posts: 10850
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Todd »

EZYLYF wrote:
As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?
One is hard.
You know what La Quinta means in English? Behind Dennys. MarkM
Rik
Posts: 14006
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Sarasota
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Rik »

Sounds like a college educated donkey answer but actually shows wisdom gained only from experience.
Over every mountain there is a path, although it may not be seen from the valley
EZYLYF
King of Broken Fly Rods
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:24 am
Location: Tampa

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by EZYLYF »

Todd wrote:
EZYLYF wrote:
As for the Hard mono, whats the difference between it and regular mono?
One is hard.

Why would I expect any less from you....Thanks for clearing that up for me....Lol
Todd if one is hard and one is regular, could we have a constipation problem here...
Todd
PFTS Chairman
PFTS Chairman
Posts: 10850
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Todd »

Hey, you asked. :lol:

This is somewhat of an explanation-

http://midcurrent.com/experts/soft-vs-h ... r-leaders/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You know what La Quinta means in English? Behind Dennys. MarkM
Rik
Posts: 14006
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: Sarasota
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Rik »

I was gonna suggest you hold both hard and soft in your hand as the difference is quite evident but I really didn't want to explain how I knew.
Over every mountain there is a path, although it may not be seen from the valley
EZYLYF
King of Broken Fly Rods
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:24 am
Location: Tampa

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by EZYLYF »

Rik wrote:I was gonna suggest you hold both hard and soft in your hand as the difference is quite evident but I really didn't want to explain how I knew.
Gotcha, I'm hoping it feels hard.
User avatar
BearsFan
Egotistical Prick
Posts: 4040
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Location: 32303, its like 90210 but with more beer

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by BearsFan »

Hard is used for fly leaders, soft is used in snoopy poles.
Senior Exalted Pro Staff Member of the Paddle-Fishing.com Kayak & Canoe Anglers Club

"You think you have problems now? Follow your instincts, it will get worse" -Hatch
User avatar
Evan
Posts: 563
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: SRQ
Contact:

Re: Flourocarbon vs. Monofilament fly leaders

Post by Evan »

BearsFan wrote:Write down the date. I agree with Evan!
:shock: The Devil better get a warm coat! Haha
Everyone is entitled to my opinion
Post Reply